It seems real data on the "Best Prop" remains elusive, especially given all the possible configurations and uses. I have complied 39 pages of tests and comments, I will try to summarize this below. The Mercury Prop Selector for the big engine TriToon recommends (the the result details only reference engines up to 115HP???):
Handling: Rev 4 14.6x17 - But is that cornering vs low speed docking vs ???
Acceleration & Top Speed: Enertia 14.75x16 - This one we all understand!
Fuel Economy: Enertia ECO 16x17 - OK, but by how much?
Overall: Enertia 14.5x17 - I would love to see how they weighted the above factors
http://www.carefreeboatsales.com/prop-testing.html - compiled a great article on different engines, weight, and other variables, but never really published their findings on props. I sent an inquiry.....
https://www.boatingmag.com/mercury-enertia-eco-pro/ - has a great summary of the ECO fuel economy savings (21% to 43% - that would equal about $300 to $600 fuel savings per season for me per the $1.5K spend per year), but this was on a V Hull on long distance runs...generally not our primary usage. Interestingly, they did not compare / use an Enertia (Mirage vs Rev4 vs ECO).
https://www.boatingmag.com/boats/choosing-right-prop/ is the BEST comparison I have found, but again on center console V hull, though still GREAT relative data:
Enerita 14 7/8 x 17 VS
Enertia 14 7/8 x 16 VS
Rev 4 14 5/8 x 17: MPH & 0-20MPH Seconds
Light Load 46.4 & 3.6s / 44.9 & 3.5s / 41.9 & 3.4s
Heavy Load 43.9 & 4.5s / 43.0 & 3.9s / 41.8 & 4.3s
Online I bumped into a seemingly knowledgeable sales guy claim they specialized in Bennington ESP's, and strongly suggested the Rev 4 was really the best all-around on the 25' plus ESP's - if you did not mind giving up the few MPH (as noted above). He also made on interesting point that the 25" Merc's shafts were actually shorter, and thus best on the lowest or one from lowest depth, while this was NOT true for the Merc V10 or Yamahas (which seems to by why we get different answers on engine mount position). Of course we are still missing solid data on the ECO prop with such detailed comparison, and I still don't know what "better handling" really is. If this means docking is significantly more responsive, then that could be a real factor worth considering!
Though with my 14.7x16 - I do love zipping past most other boats on our huge lake as we take the 20 to 40 mile "cruise" to the center or north end of the lake a few times per season (though the CAT's and Twins make me look like I am standing still)... now would saving $60 to $120 of gas per trip be worth passing a few extra boats, or having a LOT better control when docking in our very tight space...details to contemplate....I think I need more data and another beer

.